Madagascar, Republic of vs Malaysia: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Madagascar, Republic of
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 263,254 hectares against 262,864 hectares in Madagascar, Republic of, a difference of 390 hectares.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Malaysia ahead.
Madagascar, Republic of ranks 14th and Malaysia ranks 13th of 190 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar, Republic of | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 106,183 hectares | 365,449 hectares | 259,265 hectares | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 293,071 hectares | 483,883 hectares | 190,812 hectares | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 254,941 hectares | 274,824 hectares | 19,883 hectares | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Madagascar, Republic of or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 263,254 hectares against 262,864 hectares in Madagascar, Republic of as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Madagascar, Republic of and Malaysia?
- 390 hectares, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar, Republic of and Malaysia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Madagascar, Republic of and Malaysia rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Madagascar, Republic of ranks 14th and Malaysia ranks 13th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.