Kuwait vs Malta: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Kuwait
- Malta
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Malta, a difference of 0 hectares.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Kuwait ranks 167th and Malta ranks 167th of 189 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares | 1.22 hectares | 1.22 hectares | Malta |
| 2010s | 0 hectares | 0.2 hectares | 0.2 hectares | Malta |
| 2020s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Kuwait or Malta?
- Kuwait, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Malta as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Kuwait and Malta?
- 0 hectares, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Malta?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Kuwait and Malta rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Kuwait ranks 167th and Malta ranks 167th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.