Republic of Korea vs Thailand: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Republic of Korea
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 111,551 hectares against 86,981 hectares in Republic of Korea, a difference of 24,570 hectares.
That makes Thailand's figure about 1.3 times Republic of Korea's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
Republic of Korea ranks 36th and Thailand ranks 33rd of 190 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9,204 hectares | 81,848 hectares | 72,644 hectares | Thailand |
| 2010s | 16,823 hectares | 131,818 hectares | 114,995 hectares | Thailand |
| 2020s | 31,233 hectares | 124,652 hectares | 93,419 hectares | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Republic of Korea or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 111,551 hectares against 86,981 hectares in Republic of Korea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Republic of Korea and Thailand?
- 24,570 hectares, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Thailand?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Republic of Korea and Thailand rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Republic of Korea ranks 36th and Thailand ranks 33rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.