Jamaica vs Panama: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Jamaica
- Panama
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 21,170 hectares against 18,530 hectares in Panama, a difference of 2,640 hectares.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Panama ahead.
Jamaica ranks 70th and Panama ranks 72nd of 190 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,784 hectares | 23,334 hectares | 20,550 hectares | Panama |
| 2010s | 2,314 hectares | 20,479 hectares | 18,165 hectares | Panama |
| 2020s | 4,958 hectares | 22,395 hectares | 17,438 hectares | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Jamaica or Panama?
- Jamaica, at 21,170 hectares against 18,530 hectares in Panama as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Jamaica and Panama?
- 2,640 hectares, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Panama?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Jamaica and Panama rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Jamaica ranks 70th and Panama ranks 72nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.