Honduras vs New Zealand: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Honduras
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 39,723 hectares against 34,244 hectares in Honduras, a difference of 5,479 hectares.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Honduras's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was New Zealand ahead.
Honduras ranks 59th and New Zealand ranks 57th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39,258 hectares | 57,451 hectares | 18,193 hectares | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 74,191 hectares | 71,242 hectares | 2,948 hectares | Honduras |
| 2020s | 69,022 hectares | 52,561 hectares | 16,462 hectares | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Honduras or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 39,723 hectares against 34,244 hectares in Honduras as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Honduras and New Zealand?
- 5,479 hectares, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and New Zealand?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Honduras and New Zealand rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Honduras ranks 59th and New Zealand ranks 57th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.