Honduras vs Italy: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Honduras
- Italy
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 34,244 hectares against 29,315 hectares in Italy, a difference of 4,929 hectares.
That makes Honduras's figure about 1.2 times Italy's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Honduras has been ahead every year.
Honduras ranks 59th and Italy ranks 62nd of 190 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39,258 hectares | 11,440 hectares | 27,817 hectares | Honduras |
| 2010s | 74,191 hectares | 25,557 hectares | 48,634 hectares | Honduras |
| 2020s | 69,022 hectares | 32,074 hectares | 36,949 hectares | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Honduras or Italy?
- Honduras, at 34,244 hectares against 29,315 hectares in Italy as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Honduras and Italy?
- 4,929 hectares, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Italy?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Honduras and Italy rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Honduras ranks 59th and Italy ranks 62nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.