Guyana vs Romania: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Guyana
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 23,475 hectares against 19,296 hectares in Guyana, a difference of 4,179 hectares.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.2 times Guyana's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Romania ahead.
Guyana ranks 71st and Romania ranks 68th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,788 hectares | 18,495 hectares | 11,707 hectares | Romania |
| 2010s | 14,396 hectares | 18,216 hectares | 3,820 hectares | Romania |
| 2020s | 31,731 hectares | 21,278 hectares | 10,452 hectares | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Guyana or Romania?
- Romania, at 23,475 hectares against 19,296 hectares in Guyana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Guyana and Romania?
- 4,179 hectares, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Romania?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Guyana and Romania rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Guyana ranks 71st and Romania ranks 68th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.