Guinea vs Poland: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Guinea
- Poland
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 104,703 hectares against 78,461 hectares in Poland, a difference of 26,242 hectares.
That makes Guinea's figure about 1.3 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Poland ahead.
Guinea ranks 35th and Poland ranks 38th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20,274 hectares | 44,171 hectares | 23,897 hectares | Poland |
| 2010s | 133,308 hectares | 67,375 hectares | 65,933 hectares | Guinea |
| 2020s | 146,938 hectares | 75,155 hectares | 71,783 hectares | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Guinea or Poland?
- Guinea, at 104,703 hectares against 78,461 hectares in Poland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Guinea and Poland?
- 26,242 hectares, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Poland?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Guinea and Poland rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Guinea ranks 35th and Poland ranks 38th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.