Grenada vs Kyrgyzstan: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Grenada
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 37 hectares against 35 hectares in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 2 hectares.
That makes Grenada's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Grenada ranks 141st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 143rd of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 122.89 hectares | 200.56 hectares | 77.67 hectares | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 57.4 hectares | 60 hectares | 2.6 hectares | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 58.17 hectares | 40.83 hectares | 17.33 hectares | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Grenada or Kyrgyzstan?
- Grenada, at 37 hectares against 35 hectares in Kyrgyzstan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Grenada and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2 hectares, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Kyrgyzstan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Grenada and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Grenada ranks 141st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 143rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.