Grenada vs Iran: Tree Cover Loss

Grenada
37 hectares
in 2025
Iran
80 hectares
in 2025
Grenada rank
141st
Iran rank
140th

Tree Cover Loss over time

  • Grenada
  • Iran
0200400600200120132025

How they compare

Iran currently reports 80 hectares against 37 hectares in Grenada, a difference of 43 hectares.

That makes Iran's figure about 2.2 times Grenada's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Iran ahead.

Grenada ranks 141st and Iran ranks 140th of 189 countries.

Iran has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Iran Difference Ahead
2000s 122.89 hectares 278.11 hectares 155.22 hectares Iran
2010s 57.4 hectares 131.6 hectares 74.2 hectares Iran
2020s 58.17 hectares 69.83 hectares 11.67 hectares Iran

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss, Grenada or Iran?
Iran, at 80 hectares against 37 hectares in Grenada as of 2025.
What is the difference in tree cover loss between Grenada and Iran?
43 hectares, with Iran ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Iran?
25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Grenada and Iran rank globally for tree cover loss?
Grenada ranks 141st and Iran ranks 140th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Tree Cover Loss (hectares)
Unit
hectares
Source
Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 4,725 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed

Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.