Greece vs Kenya: Tree Cover Loss

Greece
10,224 hectares
in 2025
Kenya
10,418 hectares
in 2025
Greece rank
85th
Kenya rank
84th

Tree Cover Loss over time

  • Greece
  • Kenya
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k200120132025

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 10,418 hectares against 10,224 hectares in Greece, a difference of 194 hectares.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Kenya ahead.

Greece ranks 85th and Kenya ranks 84th of 189 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Greece averaged higher in 1 and Kenya in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greece Kenya Difference Ahead
2000s 12,497 hectares 18,475 hectares 5,978 hectares Kenya
2010s 7,045 hectares 17,550 hectares 10,504 hectares Kenya
2020s 22,168 hectares 11,504 hectares 10,664 hectares Greece

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss, Greece or Kenya?
Kenya, at 10,418 hectares against 10,224 hectares in Greece as of 2025.
What is the difference in tree cover loss between Greece and Kenya?
194 hectares, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Kenya?
25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Greece and Kenya rank globally for tree cover loss?
Greece ranks 85th and Kenya ranks 84th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Tree Cover Loss (hectares)
Unit
hectares
Source
Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 4,725 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed

Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.