Germany vs Latvia, Republic of: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Germany
- Latvia, Republic of
How they compare
Germany currently reports 56,073 hectares against 55,492 hectares in Latvia, Republic of, a difference of 581 hectares.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Latvia, Republic of ahead.
Germany ranks 51st and Latvia, Republic of ranks 52nd of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 2 and Latvia, Republic of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Latvia, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38,672 hectares | 31,778 hectares | 6,894 hectares | Germany |
| 2010s | 40,590 hectares | 41,469 hectares | 878.5 hectares | Latvia, Republic of |
| 2020s | 124,067 hectares | 53,773 hectares | 70,294 hectares | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Germany or Latvia, Republic of?
- Germany, at 56,073 hectares against 55,492 hectares in Latvia, Republic of as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Germany and Latvia, Republic of?
- 581 hectares, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Latvia, Republic of?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Germany and Latvia, Republic of rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Germany ranks 51st and Latvia, Republic of ranks 52nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.