Georgia vs Netherlands: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Georgia
- Netherlands
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 635 hectares against 554 hectares in Georgia, a difference of 81 hectares.
That makes Netherlands's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Netherlands ahead.
Georgia ranks 126th and Netherlands ranks 125th of 190 countries.
Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 747.56 hectares | 1,164 hectares | 416.67 hectares | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 343.8 hectares | 1,428 hectares | 1,084 hectares | Netherlands |
| 2020s | 463.5 hectares | 1,548 hectares | 1,084 hectares | Netherlands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Georgia or Netherlands?
- Netherlands, at 635 hectares against 554 hectares in Georgia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Georgia and Netherlands?
- 81 hectares, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Netherlands?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Georgia and Netherlands rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Georgia ranks 126th and Netherlands ranks 125th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.