Ethiopia vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Tree Cover Loss

Ethiopia
24,980 hectares
in 2025
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
26,566 hectares
in 2025
Ethiopia rank
67th
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
66th

Tree Cover Loss over time

  • Ethiopia
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k200120132025

How they compare

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland currently reports 26,566 hectares against 24,980 hectares in Ethiopia, a difference of 1,586 hectares.

That makes United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 67th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 66th of 190 countries.

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
2000s 17,688 hectares 20,158 hectares 2,470 hectares United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2010s 25,059 hectares 27,625 hectares 2,566 hectares United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2020s 24,476 hectares 25,706 hectares 1,230 hectares United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss, Ethiopia or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, at 26,566 hectares against 24,980 hectares in Ethiopia as of 2025.
What is the difference in tree cover loss between Ethiopia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
1,586 hectares, with United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Ethiopia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for tree cover loss?
Ethiopia ranks 67th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 66th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Tree Cover Loss. Statizoid, drawing on Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-hectares/ethiopia/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-hectares/ethiopia/united-kingdom/">Ethiopia vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Tree Cover Loss</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tree Cover Loss (hectares)
Unit
hectares
Source
Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 4,725 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed

Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.