Estonia vs Honduras: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Estonia
- Honduras
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 34,244 hectares against 31,059 hectares in Estonia, a difference of 3,185 hectares.
That makes Honduras's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Honduras has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 60th and Honduras ranks 59th of 190 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16,932 hectares | 39,258 hectares | 22,326 hectares | Honduras |
| 2010s | 29,361 hectares | 74,191 hectares | 44,829 hectares | Honduras |
| 2020s | 35,356 hectares | 69,022 hectares | 33,666 hectares | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Estonia or Honduras?
- Honduras, at 34,244 hectares against 31,059 hectares in Estonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Estonia and Honduras?
- 3,185 hectares, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Honduras?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Estonia and Honduras rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Estonia ranks 60th and Honduras ranks 59th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.