Which has higher tree cover loss, Eritrea or San Marino?

Eritrea, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in San Marino as of 2025.

What is the difference in tree cover loss between Eritrea and San Marino?

0 hectares, with Eritrea ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and San Marino?

25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eritrea vs San Marino: Tree Cover Loss

Eritrea

0 hectares

in 2025

San Marino

0 hectares

in 2025

Eritrea rank

167th

San Marino rank

167th

Tree Cover Loss over time

Eritrea
San Marino

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in San Marino, a difference of 0 hectares.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Eritrea ahead.

Eritrea ranks 167th and San Marino ranks 167th of 190 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and San Marino in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eritrea	San Marino	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.3333 hectares	0.2222 hectares	0.1111 hectares	Eritrea
2010s	0 hectares	0.1 hectares	0.1 hectares	San Marino
2020s	0 hectares	0 hectares	0 hectares	—

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss, Eritrea or San Marino?: Eritrea, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in San Marino as of 2025.
What is the difference in tree cover loss between Eritrea and San Marino?: 0 hectares, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and San Marino?: 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Eritrea and San Marino rank globally for tree cover loss?: Eritrea ranks 167th and San Marino ranks 167th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs San Marino: Tree Cover Loss. Statizoid, drawing on Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-hectares/eritrea/san-marino/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-hectares/eritrea/san-marino/">Eritrea vs San Marino: Tree Cover Loss</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree Cover Loss (hectares)
Unit: hectares
Source: Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 4,725 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed: 24 August 2026

Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.