Which has higher tree cover loss, Cyprus or Pakistan?

Cyprus, at 137 hectares against 112 hectares in Pakistan as of 2025.

What is the difference in tree cover loss between Cyprus and Pakistan?

25 hectares, with Cyprus ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Pakistan?

25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cyprus vs Pakistan: Tree Cover Loss

Cyprus

137 hectares

in 2025

Pakistan

112 hectares

in 2025

Cyprus rank

136th

Pakistan rank

138th

Tree Cover Loss over time

Cyprus
Pakistan

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 137 hectares against 112 hectares in Pakistan, a difference of 25 hectares.

That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.2 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Pakistan ahead.

Cyprus ranks 136th and Pakistan ranks 138th of 190 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cyprus	Pakistan	Difference	Ahead
2000s	138.56 hectares	812.33 hectares	673.78 hectares	Pakistan
2010s	138.5 hectares	179.6 hectares	41.1 hectares	Pakistan
2020s	183.33 hectares	89.33 hectares	94 hectares	Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss, Cyprus or Pakistan?: Cyprus, at 137 hectares against 112 hectares in Pakistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in tree cover loss between Cyprus and Pakistan?: 25 hectares, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Pakistan?: 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Cyprus and Pakistan rank globally for tree cover loss?: Cyprus ranks 136th and Pakistan ranks 138th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Pakistan: Tree Cover Loss. Statizoid, drawing on Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-hectares/cyprus/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-hectares/cyprus/pakistan/">Cyprus vs Pakistan: Tree Cover Loss</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree Cover Loss (hectares)
Unit: hectares
Source: Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 4,725 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.