Cuba vs Italy: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Cuba
- Italy
How they compare
Italy currently reports 29,315 hectares against 27,997 hectares in Cuba, a difference of 1,318 hectares.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 63rd and Italy ranks 62nd of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Italy in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14,319 hectares | 11,440 hectares | 2,878 hectares | Cuba |
| 2010s | 22,721 hectares | 25,557 hectares | 2,836 hectares | Italy |
| 2020s | 14,018 hectares | 32,074 hectares | 18,056 hectares | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Cuba or Italy?
- Italy, at 29,315 hectares against 27,997 hectares in Cuba as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Cuba and Italy?
- 1,318 hectares, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Italy?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Cuba and Italy rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Cuba ranks 63rd and Italy ranks 62nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.