Which has higher tree cover loss, Cuba or Estonia, Republic of?

Estonia, Republic of, at 31,059 hectares against 27,997 hectares in Cuba as of 2025.

What is the difference in tree cover loss between Cuba and Estonia, Republic of?

3,062 hectares, with Estonia, Republic of ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Estonia, Republic of?

25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cuba vs Estonia, Republic of: Tree Cover Loss

Cuba

27,997 hectares

in 2025

Estonia, Republic of

31,059 hectares

in 2025

Cuba rank

63rd

Estonia, Republic of rank

60th

Tree Cover Loss over time

Cuba
Estonia, Republic of

How they compare

Estonia, Republic of currently reports 31,059 hectares against 27,997 hectares in Cuba, a difference of 3,062 hectares.

That makes Estonia, Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 63rd and Estonia, Republic of ranks 60th of 190 countries.

Estonia, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cuba	Estonia, Republic of	Difference	Ahead
2000s	14,319 hectares	16,932 hectares	2,614 hectares	Estonia, Republic of
2010s	22,721 hectares	29,361 hectares	6,640 hectares	Estonia, Republic of
2020s	14,018 hectares	35,356 hectares	21,339 hectares	Estonia, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss, Cuba or Estonia, Republic of?: Estonia, Republic of, at 31,059 hectares against 27,997 hectares in Cuba as of 2025.
What is the difference in tree cover loss between Cuba and Estonia, Republic of?: 3,062 hectares, with Estonia, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Estonia, Republic of?: 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Cuba and Estonia, Republic of rank globally for tree cover loss?: Cuba ranks 63rd and Estonia, Republic of ranks 60th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Estonia, Republic of: Tree Cover Loss. Statizoid, drawing on Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-hectares/cuba/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-hectares/cuba/estonia/">Cuba vs Estonia, Republic of: Tree Cover Loss</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree Cover Loss (hectares)
Unit: hectares
Source: Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 4,725 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.