Colombia vs Paraguay: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Colombia
- Paraguay
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 186,035 hectares against 149,845 hectares in Paraguay, a difference of 36,190 hectares.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.2 times Paraguay's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 25th and Paraguay ranks 27th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and Paraguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 211,727 hectares | 269,614 hectares | 57,887 hectares | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 243,240 hectares | 360,484 hectares | 117,244 hectares | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 241,799 hectares | 222,900 hectares | 18,899 hectares | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Colombia or Paraguay?
- Colombia, at 186,035 hectares against 149,845 hectares in Paraguay as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Colombia and Paraguay?
- 36,190 hectares, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Paraguay?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Colombia and Paraguay rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Colombia ranks 25th and Paraguay ranks 27th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.