Chile vs Philippines: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Chile
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 41,584 hectares against 38,790 hectares in Chile, a difference of 2,794 hectares.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 58th and Philippines ranks 56th of 189 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94,621 hectares | 47,167 hectares | 47,454 hectares | Chile |
| 2010s | 117,750 hectares | 80,067 hectares | 37,683 hectares | Chile |
| 2020s | 67,308 hectares | 56,780 hectares | 10,527 hectares | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Chile or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 41,584 hectares against 38,790 hectares in Chile as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Chile and Philippines?
- 2,794 hectares, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Philippines?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Philippines rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Chile ranks 58th and Philippines ranks 56th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.