Chile vs Lithuania: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Chile
- Lithuania
How they compare
Chile currently reports 38,790 hectares against 29,532 hectares in Lithuania, a difference of 9,258 hectares.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times Lithuania's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 58th and Lithuania ranks 61st of 189 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94,621 hectares | 13,756 hectares | 80,865 hectares | Chile |
| 2010s | 117,750 hectares | 20,234 hectares | 97,516 hectares | Chile |
| 2020s | 67,308 hectares | 24,323 hectares | 42,984 hectares | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Chile or Lithuania?
- Chile, at 38,790 hectares against 29,532 hectares in Lithuania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Chile and Lithuania?
- 9,258 hectares, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Lithuania?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Lithuania rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Chile ranks 58th and Lithuania ranks 61st of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.