Chad vs Syrian Arab Republic: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Chad
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Chad currently reports 12,533 hectares against 12,422 hectares in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 111 hectares.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 79th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 81st of 190 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,380 hectares | 472.44 hectares | 907.11 hectares | Chad |
| 2010s | 3,408 hectares | 1,643 hectares | 1,764 hectares | Chad |
| 2020s | 8,444 hectares | 3,701 hectares | 4,743 hectares | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Chad or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Chad, at 12,533 hectares against 12,422 hectares in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Chad and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 111 hectares, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Chad and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Chad ranks 79th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 81st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.