Cabo Verde vs Eritrea, The State of: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Cabo Verde
- Eritrea, The State of
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Eritrea, The State of, a difference of 0 hectares.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Cabo Verde ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 167th and Eritrea, The State of ranks 167th of 190 countries.
Cabo Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Eritrea, The State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.62 hectares | 0 hectares | 6.62 hectares | Cabo Verde |
| 2010s | 5.1 hectares | 0 hectares | 5.1 hectares | Cabo Verde |
| 2020s | 1.5 hectares | 0 hectares | 1.5 hectares | Cabo Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Cabo Verde or Eritrea, The State of?
- Cabo Verde, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Eritrea, The State of as of 2021.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Cabo Verde and Eritrea, The State of?
- 0 hectares, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Eritrea, The State of?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do Cabo Verde and Eritrea, The State of rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Cabo Verde ranks 167th and Eritrea, The State of ranks 167th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.