Burundi vs North Macedonia: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Burundi
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 2,656 hectares against 2,264 hectares in North Macedonia, a difference of 392 hectares.
That makes Burundi's figure about 1.2 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Burundi ranks 112th and North Macedonia ranks 114th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,157 hectares | 2,391 hectares | 1,234 hectares | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 1,726 hectares | 1,705 hectares | 21.4 hectares | Burundi |
| 2020s | 2,082 hectares | 2,288 hectares | 205.83 hectares | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Burundi or North Macedonia?
- Burundi, at 2,656 hectares against 2,264 hectares in North Macedonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Burundi and North Macedonia?
- 392 hectares, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and North Macedonia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Burundi and North Macedonia rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Burundi ranks 112th and North Macedonia ranks 114th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.