Burundi vs Morocco: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Burundi
- Morocco
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 2,666 hectares against 2,656 hectares in Burundi, a difference of 10 hectares.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Morocco ahead.
Burundi ranks 112th and Morocco ranks 111th of 190 countries.
Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,157 hectares | 2,238 hectares | 1,081 hectares | Morocco |
| 2010s | 1,726 hectares | 1,728 hectares | 1.6 hectares | Morocco |
| 2020s | 2,082 hectares | 4,209 hectares | 2,128 hectares | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Burundi or Morocco?
- Morocco, at 2,666 hectares against 2,656 hectares in Burundi as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Burundi and Morocco?
- 10 hectares, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Morocco?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Burundi and Morocco rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Burundi ranks 112th and Morocco ranks 111th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.