Burundi vs Haiti: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Burundi
- Haiti
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 2,656 hectares against 2,189 hectares in Haiti, a difference of 467 hectares.
That makes Burundi's figure about 1.2 times Haiti's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Haiti ahead.
Burundi ranks 112th and Haiti ranks 115th of 190 countries.
Haiti has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Haiti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,157 hectares | 1,997 hectares | 839.67 hectares | Haiti |
| 2010s | 1,726 hectares | 5,034 hectares | 3,308 hectares | Haiti |
| 2020s | 2,082 hectares | 2,537 hectares | 455.5 hectares | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Burundi or Haiti?
- Burundi, at 2,656 hectares against 2,189 hectares in Haiti as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Burundi and Haiti?
- 467 hectares, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Haiti?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Burundi and Haiti rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Burundi ranks 112th and Haiti ranks 115th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.