Bulgaria vs Uruguay: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Bulgaria
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 9,399 hectares against 9,103 hectares in Bulgaria, a difference of 296 hectares.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Bulgaria ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 89th and Uruguay ranks 88th of 190 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,673 hectares | 15,759 hectares | 9,087 hectares | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 6,352 hectares | 21,956 hectares | 15,604 hectares | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 5,949 hectares | 14,580 hectares | 8,630 hectares | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Bulgaria or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 9,399 hectares against 9,103 hectares in Bulgaria as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Bulgaria and Uruguay?
- 296 hectares, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Uruguay?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Bulgaria and Uruguay rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Bulgaria ranks 89th and Uruguay ranks 88th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.