Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Rwanda: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Rwanda
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 3,791 hectares against 3,758 hectares in Rwanda, a difference of 33 hectares.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Rwanda ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 104th and Rwanda ranks 105th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,473 hectares | 1,125 hectares | 348.56 hectares | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 1,681 hectares | 2,436 hectares | 755 hectares | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 2,480 hectares | 3,174 hectares | 694.33 hectares | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Rwanda?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 3,791 hectares against 3,758 hectares in Rwanda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Rwanda?
- 33 hectares, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Rwanda?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Rwanda rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 104th and Rwanda ranks 105th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.