Bhutan vs Slovenia: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Bhutan
- Slovenia
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 3,446 hectares against 3,331 hectares in Slovenia, a difference of 115 hectares.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Slovenia ahead.
Bhutan ranks 108th and Slovenia ranks 109th of 190 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 658.89 hectares | 1,358 hectares | 699.33 hectares | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 1,467 hectares | 3,274 hectares | 1,808 hectares | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 1,708 hectares | 3,441 hectares | 1,733 hectares | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Bhutan or Slovenia?
- Bhutan, at 3,446 hectares against 3,331 hectares in Slovenia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Bhutan and Slovenia?
- 115 hectares, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Slovenia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Bhutan and Slovenia rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Bhutan ranks 108th and Slovenia ranks 109th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.