Belize vs Dominican Republic: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Belize
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Belize currently reports 12,519 hectares against 11,421 hectares in Dominican Republic, a difference of 1,098 hectares.
That makes Belize's figure about 1.1 times Dominican Republic's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Belize ranks 80th and Dominican Republic ranks 83rd of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 1 and Dominican Republic in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,464 hectares | 15,770 hectares | 7,306 hectares | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 15,970 hectares | 16,731 hectares | 761.2 hectares | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 18,888 hectares | 16,022 hectares | 2,866 hectares | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Belize or Dominican Republic?
- Belize, at 12,519 hectares against 11,421 hectares in Dominican Republic as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Belize and Dominican Republic?
- 1,098 hectares, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Dominican Republic?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Belize and Dominican Republic rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Belize ranks 80th and Dominican Republic ranks 83rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.