Barbados vs Libya: Tree Cover Loss

Barbados
7 hectares
in 2025
Libya
7 hectares
in 2025
Barbados rank
157th
Libya rank
157th

Tree Cover Loss over time

  • Barbados
  • Libya
0255075100125200120132025

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 7 hectares against 7 hectares in Libya, a difference of 0 hectares.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Libya ahead.

Barbados ranks 157th and Libya ranks 157th of 189 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Libya in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Libya Difference Ahead
2000s 11.89 hectares 16.22 hectares 4.33 hectares Libya
2010s 26.8 hectares 12.4 hectares 14.4 hectares Barbados
2020s 10.83 hectares 19.67 hectares 8.83 hectares Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss, Barbados or Libya?
Barbados, at 7 hectares against 7 hectares in Libya as of 2025.
What is the difference in tree cover loss between Barbados and Libya?
0 hectares, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Libya?
25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Barbados and Libya rank globally for tree cover loss?
Barbados ranks 157th and Libya ranks 157th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Tree Cover Loss (hectares)
Unit
hectares
Source
Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 4,725 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed

Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.