Bahamas vs Fiji: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Bahamas
- Fiji
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 1,549 hectares against 1,262 hectares in Fiji, a difference of 287 hectares.
That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.2 times Fiji's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Fiji ahead.
Bahamas ranks 120th and Fiji ranks 121st of 190 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 925.88 hectares | 1,778 hectares | 851.75 hectares | Fiji |
| 2010s | 1,427 hectares | 2,663 hectares | 1,236 hectares | Fiji |
| 2020s | 2,122 hectares | 4,633 hectares | 2,510 hectares | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Bahamas or Fiji?
- Bahamas, at 1,549 hectares against 1,262 hectares in Fiji as of 2021.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Bahamas and Fiji?
- 287 hectares, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Fiji?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do Bahamas and Fiji rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Bahamas ranks 120th and Fiji ranks 121st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.