Which has higher tree cover loss, Azerbaijan, Republic of or Cyprus?

Azerbaijan, Republic of, at 138 hectares against 137 hectares in Cyprus as of 2025.

What is the difference in tree cover loss between Azerbaijan, Republic of and Cyprus?

1 hectares, with Azerbaijan, Republic of ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan, Republic of and Cyprus?

25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Azerbaijan, Republic of vs Cyprus: Tree Cover Loss

Azerbaijan, Republic of

138 hectares

in 2025

Cyprus

137 hectares

in 2025

Azerbaijan, Republic of rank

135th

Cyprus rank

136th

Tree Cover Loss over time

Azerbaijan, Republic of
Cyprus

How they compare

Azerbaijan, Republic of currently reports 138 hectares against 137 hectares in Cyprus, a difference of 1 hectares.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Azerbaijan, Republic of ahead.

Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 135th and Cyprus ranks 136th of 190 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Azerbaijan, Republic of averaged higher in 2 and Cyprus in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Azerbaijan, Republic of	Cyprus	Difference	Ahead
2000s	606 hectares	138.56 hectares	467.44 hectares	Azerbaijan, Republic of
2010s	199.1 hectares	138.5 hectares	60.6 hectares	Azerbaijan, Republic of
2020s	171 hectares	183.33 hectares	12.33 hectares	Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss, Azerbaijan, Republic of or Cyprus?: Azerbaijan, Republic of, at 138 hectares against 137 hectares in Cyprus as of 2025.
What is the difference in tree cover loss between Azerbaijan, Republic of and Cyprus?: 1 hectares, with Azerbaijan, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan, Republic of and Cyprus?: 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Azerbaijan, Republic of and Cyprus rank globally for tree cover loss?: Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 135th and Cyprus ranks 136th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan, Republic of vs Cyprus: Tree Cover Loss. Statizoid, drawing on Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-hectares/azerbaijan/cyprus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-hectares/azerbaijan/cyprus/">Azerbaijan, Republic of vs Cyprus: Tree Cover Loss</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree Cover Loss (hectares)
Unit: hectares
Source: Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 4,725 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.