Austria vs Cuba: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Austria
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 27,997 hectares against 27,575 hectares in Austria, a difference of 422 hectares.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Cuba ahead.
Austria ranks 64th and Cuba ranks 63rd of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 2 and Cuba in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17,297 hectares | 14,319 hectares | 2,978 hectares | Austria |
| 2010s | 16,708 hectares | 22,721 hectares | 6,014 hectares | Cuba |
| 2020s | 24,008 hectares | 14,018 hectares | 9,990 hectares | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Austria or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 27,997 hectares against 27,575 hectares in Austria as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Austria and Cuba?
- 422 hectares, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Cuba?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Austria and Cuba rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Austria ranks 64th and Cuba ranks 63rd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.