Australia vs Indonesia: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Australia
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 1.16 million hectares against 384,105 hectares in Australia, a difference of 777,725 hectares.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 3.0 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Indonesia ahead.
Australia ranks 9th and Indonesia ranks 6th of 190 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 241,674 hectares | 1.20 million hectares | 955,840 hectares | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 393,534 hectares | 1.60 million hectares | 1.20 million hectares | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 582,006 hectares | 1.06 million hectares | 478,924 hectares | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Australia or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 1.16 million hectares against 384,105 hectares in Australia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Australia and Indonesia?
- 777,725 hectares, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Indonesia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Australia and Indonesia rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Australia ranks 9th and Indonesia ranks 6th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.