Australia vs China, People's Republic of: Tree Cover Loss

Australia
384,105 hectares
in 2025
China, People's Republic of
650,785 hectares
in 2025
Australia rank
9th
China, People's Republic of rank
8th

Tree Cover Loss over time

  • Australia
  • China, People's Republic of
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M200120132025

How they compare

China, People's Republic of currently reports 650,785 hectares against 384,105 hectares in Australia, a difference of 266,680 hectares.

That makes China, People's Republic of's figure about 1.7 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was China, People's Republic of ahead.

Australia ranks 9th and China, People's Republic of ranks 8th of 190 countries.

China, People's Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia China, People's Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 241,674 hectares 465,844 hectares 224,170 hectares China, People's Republic of
2010s 393,534 hectares 572,504 hectares 178,970 hectares China, People's Republic of
2020s 582,006 hectares 583,314 hectares 1,308 hectares China, People's Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss, Australia or China, People's Republic of?
China, People's Republic of, at 650,785 hectares against 384,105 hectares in Australia as of 2025.
What is the difference in tree cover loss between Australia and China, People's Republic of?
266,680 hectares, with China, People's Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and China, People's Republic of?
25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Australia and China, People's Republic of rank globally for tree cover loss?
Australia ranks 9th and China, People's Republic of ranks 8th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs China, People's Republic of: Tree Cover Loss. Statizoid, drawing on Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-hectares/australia/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-hectares/australia/china/">Australia vs China, People's Republic of: Tree Cover Loss</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tree Cover Loss (hectares)
Unit
hectares
Source
Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 4,725 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed

Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.