Armenia, Republic of vs Mauritius: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Armenia, Republic of
- Mauritius
How they compare
Armenia, Republic of currently reports 36 hectares against 34 hectares in Mauritius, a difference of 2 hectares.
That makes Armenia, Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Mauritius ahead.
Armenia, Republic of ranks 142nd and Mauritius ranks 145th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia, Republic of averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia, Republic of | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 154.33 hectares | 182.11 hectares | 27.78 hectares | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 69.5 hectares | 141.3 hectares | 71.8 hectares | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 30.67 hectares | 5.67 hectares | 25 hectares | Armenia, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Armenia, Republic of or Mauritius?
- Armenia, Republic of, at 36 hectares against 34 hectares in Mauritius as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Armenia, Republic of and Mauritius?
- 2 hectares, with Armenia, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia, Republic of and Mauritius?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Armenia, Republic of and Mauritius rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Armenia, Republic of ranks 142nd and Mauritius ranks 145th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.