Argentina vs Côte d'Ivoire: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Argentina
- Côte d'Ivoire
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 213,072 hectares against 197,870 hectares in Argentina, a difference of 15,202 hectares.
That makes Côte d'Ivoire's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 24th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 21st of 190 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Côte d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 327,426 hectares | 99,119 hectares | 228,308 hectares | Argentina |
| 2010s | 297,139 hectares | 213,389 hectares | 83,751 hectares | Argentina |
| 2020s | 208,066 hectares | 195,465 hectares | 12,600 hectares | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Argentina or Côte d'Ivoire?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 213,072 hectares against 197,870 hectares in Argentina as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Argentina and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 15,202 hectares, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Argentina and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Argentina ranks 24th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 21st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.