Nepal vs United Republic of Tanzania: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$ PPP, 2015 prices)

Nepal
88 million USD
in 2016
United Republic of Tanzania
99.58 million USD
in 2023
Nepal rank
38th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
36th

Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$ PPP, 2015 prices) over time

  • Nepal
  • United Republic of Tanzania
406080100200420132023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 99.58 million USD against 88 million USD in Nepal, a difference of 11.58 million USD.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2004 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Nepal ranks 38th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 36th of 101 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 41.62 million USD 68.18 million USD 26.56 million USD United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 67.41 million USD 76.63 million USD 9.22 million USD United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total expenditure in agricultural r&d (us$ ppp, 2015 prices), Nepal or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 99.58 million USD against 88 million USD in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in total expenditure in agricultural r&d (us$ ppp, 2015 prices) between Nepal and United Republic of Tanzania?
11.58 million USD, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and United Republic of Tanzania?
13 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2016.
How do Nepal and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for total expenditure in agricultural r&d (us$ ppp, 2015 prices)?
Nepal ranks 38th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 36th of 101 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$ PPP, 2015 prices) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs United Republic of Tanzania: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$ PPP, 2015 prices). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/total-expenditure-in-agricultural-r-and-d-us-ppp-2015-prices-total-government-higher/nepal/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/total-expenditure-in-agricultural-r-and-d-us-ppp-2015-prices-total-government-higher/nepal/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Nepal vs United Republic of Tanzania: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$ PPP, 2015 prices)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$ PPP, 2015 prices) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
127 places, 1,913 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

The dataset contains a set of financial indicators describing national expenditures on agricultural research and development (R&D). The indicators are derived primarily from responses to the financial resources section of the ASTI questionnaire, complemented with selected external macroeconomic indicators required to ensure comparability across countries and over time.The dataset includes both directly reported financial aggregates and derived indicators, reflecting different dimensions of agricultural R&D investment. Reported expenditure data are collected in current local currency units (LCU) and refer to total institutional expenditures, as provided by national respondents. Coverage of the private for-profit sector remains limited and is therefore excluded from the dataset. To support temporal analysis and international comparability, expenditure indicators are also expressed in constant local currency units, using country-specific GDP deflators sourced from FAOSTAT. In addition, selected indicators relate agricultural R&D expenditures to key structural variables, such as agricultural value added, allowing for meaningful cross-country comparisons of research intensity and resource allocation.