Chile vs Vietnam: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$ PPP, 2015 prices)

Chile
218.89 million USD
in 2022
Vietnam
210.76 million USD
in 2022
Chile rank
24th
Vietnam rank
25th

Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$ PPP, 2015 prices) over time

  • Chile
  • Vietnam
050100150200250200420132022

How they compare

Chile currently reports 218.89 million USD against 210.76 million USD in Vietnam, a difference of 8.13 million USD.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Vietnam ahead.

Chile ranks 24th and Vietnam ranks 25th of 101 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Vietnam in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Vietnam Difference Ahead
2000s 170.34 million USD 213.47 million USD 43.13 million USD Vietnam
2010s 188.01 million USD 168.46 million USD 19.55 million USD Chile
2020s 225.14 million USD 219.15 million USD 5.99 million USD Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total expenditure in agricultural r&d (us$ ppp, 2015 prices), Chile or Vietnam?
Chile, at 218.89 million USD against 210.76 million USD in Vietnam as of 2022.
What is the difference in total expenditure in agricultural r&d (us$ ppp, 2015 prices) between Chile and Vietnam?
8.13 million USD, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Vietnam?
17 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2022.
How do Chile and Vietnam rank globally for total expenditure in agricultural r&d (us$ ppp, 2015 prices)?
Chile ranks 24th and Vietnam ranks 25th of 101 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$ PPP, 2015 prices) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Vietnam: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$ PPP, 2015 prices). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/total-expenditure-in-agricultural-r-and-d-us-ppp-2015-prices-total-government-higher/chile/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/total-expenditure-in-agricultural-r-and-d-us-ppp-2015-prices-total-government-higher/chile/viet-nam/">Chile vs Vietnam: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$ PPP, 2015 prices)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$ PPP, 2015 prices) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
127 places, 1,913 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

The dataset contains a set of financial indicators describing national expenditures on agricultural research and development (R&D). The indicators are derived primarily from responses to the financial resources section of the ASTI questionnaire, complemented with selected external macroeconomic indicators required to ensure comparability across countries and over time.The dataset includes both directly reported financial aggregates and derived indicators, reflecting different dimensions of agricultural R&D investment. Reported expenditure data are collected in current local currency units (LCU) and refer to total institutional expenditures, as provided by national respondents. Coverage of the private for-profit sector remains limited and is therefore excluded from the dataset. To support temporal analysis and international comparability, expenditure indicators are also expressed in constant local currency units, using country-specific GDP deflators sourced from FAOSTAT. In addition, selected indicators relate agricultural R&D expenditures to key structural variables, such as agricultural value added, allowing for meaningful cross-country comparisons of research intensity and resource allocation.