Chile vs Ethiopia: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$ PPP, 2015 prices)
Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$ PPP, 2015 prices) over time
- Chile
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 218.89 million USD against 178.03 million USD in Ethiopia, a difference of 40.86 million USD.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 20th and Ethiopia ranks 22nd of 84 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 170.34 million USD | 95.53 million USD | 74.81 million USD | Chile |
| 2010s | 191.91 million USD | 134.3 million USD | 57.62 million USD | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure in agricultural r&d (us$ ppp, 2015 prices), Chile or Ethiopia?
- Chile, at 218.89 million USD against 178.03 million USD in Ethiopia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in total expenditure in agricultural r&d (us$ ppp, 2015 prices) between Chile and Ethiopia?
- 40.86 million USD, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ethiopia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2016.
- How do Chile and Ethiopia rank globally for total expenditure in agricultural r&d (us$ ppp, 2015 prices)?
- Chile ranks 20th and Ethiopia ranks 22nd of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$ PPP, 2015 prices) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit (Agricultural Science and Technology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains a set of financial indicators describing national expenditures on agricultural research and development (R&D). The indicators are derived primarily from responses to the financial resources section of the ASTI questionnaire, complemented with selected external macroeconomic indicators required to ensure comparability across countries and over time.The dataset includes both directly reported financial aggregates and derived indicators, reflecting different dimensions of agricultural R&D investment. Reported expenditure data are collected in current local currency units (LCU) and refer to total institutional expenditures, as provided by national respondents. Coverage of the private for-profit sector remains limited and is therefore excluded from the dataset. To support temporal analysis and international comparability, expenditure indicators are also expressed in constant local currency units, using country-specific GDP deflators sourced from FAOSTAT. In addition, selected indicators relate agricultural R&D expenditures to key structural variables, such as agricultural value added, allowing for meaningful cross-country comparisons of research intensity and resource allocation.