Australia and New Zealand vs India: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$ PPP, 2015 prices)

Australia and New Zealand
1,261 million USD
in 2023
India
4,518 million USD
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
7th
India rank
4th

Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$ PPP, 2015 prices) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • India
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k200420132023

How they compare

India currently reports 4,518 million USD against 1,261 million USD in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 3,257 million USD.

That makes India's figure about 3.6 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, India has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and India ranks 4th of 101 countries.

India has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand India Difference Ahead
2000s 888.28 million USD 2,031 million USD 1,142 million USD India
2010s 997.03 million USD 3,245 million USD 2,248 million USD India
2020s 1,150 million USD 4,324 million USD 3,175 million USD India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total expenditure in agricultural r&d (us$ ppp, 2015 prices), Australia and New Zealand or India?
India, at 4,518 million USD against 1,261 million USD in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in total expenditure in agricultural r&d (us$ ppp, 2015 prices) between Australia and New Zealand and India?
3,257 million USD, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and India?
18 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and India rank globally for total expenditure in agricultural r&d (us$ ppp, 2015 prices)?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and India ranks 4th of 101 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$ PPP, 2015 prices) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs India: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$ PPP, 2015 prices). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/total-expenditure-in-agricultural-r-and-d-us-ppp-2015-prices-total-government-higher/australia-and-new-zealand/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/total-expenditure-in-agricultural-r-and-d-us-ppp-2015-prices-total-government-higher/australia-and-new-zealand/india/">Australia and New Zealand vs India: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$ PPP, 2015 prices)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$ PPP, 2015 prices) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
127 places, 1,913 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

The dataset contains a set of financial indicators describing national expenditures on agricultural research and development (R&D). The indicators are derived primarily from responses to the financial resources section of the ASTI questionnaire, complemented with selected external macroeconomic indicators required to ensure comparability across countries and over time.The dataset includes both directly reported financial aggregates and derived indicators, reflecting different dimensions of agricultural R&D investment. Reported expenditure data are collected in current local currency units (LCU) and refer to total institutional expenditures, as provided by national respondents. Coverage of the private for-profit sector remains limited and is therefore excluded from the dataset. To support temporal analysis and international comparability, expenditure indicators are also expressed in constant local currency units, using country-specific GDP deflators sourced from FAOSTAT. In addition, selected indicators relate agricultural R&D expenditures to key structural variables, such as agricultural value added, allowing for meaningful cross-country comparisons of research intensity and resource allocation.