Nepal vs Oman: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$, 2015 prices)
Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$, 2015 prices) over time
- Nepal
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 46.48 million USD against 25.31 million USD in Nepal, a difference of 21.17 million USD.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.8 times Nepal's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Oman has been ahead every year.
Nepal ranks 31st and Oman ranks 28th of 84 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.5 million USD | 31.24 million USD | 17.73 million USD | Oman |
| 2010s | 15.05 million USD | 40.04 million USD | 24.99 million USD | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure in agricultural r&d (us$, 2015 prices), Nepal or Oman?
- Oman, at 46.48 million USD against 25.31 million USD in Nepal as of 2012.
- What is the difference in total expenditure in agricultural r&d (us$, 2015 prices) between Nepal and Oman?
- 21.17 million USD, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Oman?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2012.
- How do Nepal and Oman rank globally for total expenditure in agricultural r&d (us$, 2015 prices)?
- Nepal ranks 31st and Oman ranks 28th of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$, 2015 prices) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit (Agricultural Science and Technology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains a set of financial indicators describing national expenditures on agricultural research and development (R&D). The indicators are derived primarily from responses to the financial resources section of the ASTI questionnaire, complemented with selected external macroeconomic indicators required to ensure comparability across countries and over time.The dataset includes both directly reported financial aggregates and derived indicators, reflecting different dimensions of agricultural R&D investment. Reported expenditure data are collected in current local currency units (LCU) and refer to total institutional expenditures, as provided by national respondents. Coverage of the private for-profit sector remains limited and is therefore excluded from the dataset. To support temporal analysis and international comparability, expenditure indicators are also expressed in constant local currency units, using country-specific GDP deflators sourced from FAOSTAT. In addition, selected indicators relate agricultural R&D expenditures to key structural variables, such as agricultural value added, allowing for meaningful cross-country comparisons of research intensity and resource allocation.