Cabo Verde vs Central Asia: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$, 2015 prices)

Cabo Verde
2.97 million USD
in 2021
Central Asia
112.62 million USD
in 2023
Cabo Verde rank
27th
Central Asia rank
24th

Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$, 2015 prices) over time

  • Cabo Verde
  • Central Asia
0255075100125200420132023

How they compare

Central Asia currently reports 112.62 million USD against 2.97 million USD in Cabo Verde, a difference of 109.65 million USD.

That makes Central Asia's figure about 37.9 times Cabo Verde's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Central Asia has been ahead every year.

Cabo Verde ranks 27th and Central Asia ranks 24th of 27 countries.

Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cabo Verde Central Asia Difference Ahead
2000s 1.28 million USD 38.15 million USD 36.87 million USD Central Asia
2010s 1.57 million USD 41.99 million USD 40.43 million USD Central Asia
2020s 3.08 million USD 72.16 million USD 69.09 million USD Central Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total expenditure in agricultural r&d (us$, 2015 prices), Cabo Verde or Central Asia?
Central Asia, at 112.62 million USD against 2.97 million USD in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
What is the difference in total expenditure in agricultural r&d (us$, 2015 prices) between Cabo Verde and Central Asia?
109.65 million USD, with Central Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Central Asia?
13 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2021.
How do Cabo Verde and Central Asia rank globally for total expenditure in agricultural r&d (us$, 2015 prices)?
Cabo Verde ranks 27th and Central Asia ranks 24th of 27 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$, 2015 prices) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit (Agricultural Science and Technology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cabo Verde vs Central Asia: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$, 2015 prices). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/total-expenditure-in-agricultural-r-and-d-us-2015-prices-total-government-higher/cabo-verde-2/central-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/total-expenditure-in-agricultural-r-and-d-us-2015-prices-total-government-higher/cabo-verde-2/central-asia/">Cabo Verde vs Central Asia: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$, 2015 prices)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (US$, 2015 prices) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit (Agricultural Science and Technology)
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 1,821 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

The dataset contains a set of financial indicators describing national expenditures on agricultural research and development (R&D). The indicators are derived primarily from responses to the financial resources section of the ASTI questionnaire, complemented with selected external macroeconomic indicators required to ensure comparability across countries and over time.The dataset includes both directly reported financial aggregates and derived indicators, reflecting different dimensions of agricultural R&D investment. Reported expenditure data are collected in current local currency units (LCU) and refer to total institutional expenditures, as provided by national respondents. Coverage of the private for-profit sector remains limited and is therefore excluded from the dataset. To support temporal analysis and international comparability, expenditure indicators are also expressed in constant local currency units, using country-specific GDP deflators sourced from FAOSTAT. In addition, selected indicators relate agricultural R&D expenditures to key structural variables, such as agricultural value added, allowing for meaningful cross-country comparisons of research intensity and resource allocation.