Turkey vs Türkiye: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency)

Turkey
4,540 million SLC
in 2023
Türkiye
4,540 million SLC
in 2023
Turkey rank
42nd
Türkiye rank
42nd

Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency) over time

  • Turkey
  • Türkiye
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k200920162023

How they compare

Turkey currently reports 4,540 million SLC against 4,540 million SLC in Türkiye, a difference of 0 million SLC.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Türkiye has been ahead every year.

Turkey ranks 42nd and Türkiye ranks 42nd of 97 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Turkey Türkiye Difference Ahead
2000s 463.6 million SLC 463.6 million SLC 0 million SLC —
2010s 508.03 million SLC 508.03 million SLC 0 million SLC —
2020s 2,693 million SLC 2,693 million SLC 0 million SLC —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency), Turkey or Türkiye?
Turkey, at 4,540 million SLC against 4,540 million SLC in Türkiye as of 2023.
What is the difference in total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency) between Turkey and Türkiye?
0 million SLC, with Turkey ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turkey and Türkiye?
7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Turkey and Türkiye rank globally for total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency)?
Turkey ranks 42nd and Türkiye ranks 42nd of 97 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Turkey vs Türkiye: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/total-expenditure-in-agricultural-r-and-d-standard-local-currency-total-government-higher/turkiye/turkiye-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/total-expenditure-in-agricultural-r-and-d-standard-local-currency-total-government-higher/turkiye/turkiye-2/">Turkey vs Türkiye: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
98 places, 1,334 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

The dataset contains a set of financial indicators describing national expenditures on agricultural research and development (R&D). The indicators are derived primarily from responses to the financial resources section of the ASTI questionnaire, complemented with selected external macroeconomic indicators required to ensure comparability across countries and over time.The dataset includes both directly reported financial aggregates and derived indicators, reflecting different dimensions of agricultural R&D investment. Reported expenditure data are collected in current local currency units (LCU) and refer to total institutional expenditures, as provided by national respondents. Coverage of the private for-profit sector remains limited and is therefore excluded from the dataset. To support temporal analysis and international comparability, expenditure indicators are also expressed in constant local currency units, using country-specific GDP deflators sourced from FAOSTAT. In addition, selected indicators relate agricultural R&D expenditures to key structural variables, such as agricultural value added, allowing for meaningful cross-country comparisons of research intensity and resource allocation.