Niger vs Turkey: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency)

Niger
4,733 million SLC
in 2023
Turkey
4,540 million SLC
in 2023
Niger rank
40th
Turkey rank
42nd

Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency) over time

  • Niger
  • Turkey
02.0k4.0k6.0k200420132023

How they compare

Niger currently reports 4,733 million SLC against 4,540 million SLC in Turkey, a difference of 193 million SLC.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Niger has been ahead every year.

Niger ranks 40th and Turkey ranks 42nd of 97 countries.

Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Niger Turkey Difference Ahead
2000s 2,439 million SLC 463.6 million SLC 1,975 million SLC Niger
2010s 2,795 million SLC 508.03 million SLC 2,287 million SLC Niger
2020s 4,635 million SLC 2,693 million SLC 1,941 million SLC Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency), Niger or Turkey?
Niger, at 4,733 million SLC against 4,540 million SLC in Turkey as of 2023.
What is the difference in total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency) between Niger and Turkey?
193 million SLC, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Turkey?
7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Niger and Turkey rank globally for total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency)?
Niger ranks 40th and Turkey ranks 42nd of 97 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Niger vs Turkey: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/total-expenditure-in-agricultural-r-and-d-standard-local-currency-total-government-higher/niger/turkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/total-expenditure-in-agricultural-r-and-d-standard-local-currency-total-government-higher/niger/turkiye/">Niger vs Turkey: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
98 places, 1,334 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

The dataset contains a set of financial indicators describing national expenditures on agricultural research and development (R&D). The indicators are derived primarily from responses to the financial resources section of the ASTI questionnaire, complemented with selected external macroeconomic indicators required to ensure comparability across countries and over time.The dataset includes both directly reported financial aggregates and derived indicators, reflecting different dimensions of agricultural R&D investment. Reported expenditure data are collected in current local currency units (LCU) and refer to total institutional expenditures, as provided by national respondents. Coverage of the private for-profit sector remains limited and is therefore excluded from the dataset. To support temporal analysis and international comparability, expenditure indicators are also expressed in constant local currency units, using country-specific GDP deflators sourced from FAOSTAT. In addition, selected indicators relate agricultural R&D expenditures to key structural variables, such as agricultural value added, allowing for meaningful cross-country comparisons of research intensity and resource allocation.