Mauritania vs Nicaragua: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency)
Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency) over time
- Mauritania
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 197.6 million SLC against 152.47 million SLC in Nicaragua, a difference of 45.13 million SLC.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.3 times Nicaragua's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.
Mauritania ranks 66th and Nicaragua ranks 69th of 97 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency), Mauritania or Nicaragua?
- Mauritania, at 197.6 million SLC against 152.47 million SLC in Nicaragua as of 2016.
- What is the difference in total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency) between Mauritania and Nicaragua?
- 45.13 million SLC, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Nicaragua?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2016.
- How do Mauritania and Nicaragua rank globally for total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency)?
- Mauritania ranks 66th and Nicaragua ranks 69th of 97 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains a set of financial indicators describing national expenditures on agricultural research and development (R&D). The indicators are derived primarily from responses to the financial resources section of the ASTI questionnaire, complemented with selected external macroeconomic indicators required to ensure comparability across countries and over time.The dataset includes both directly reported financial aggregates and derived indicators, reflecting different dimensions of agricultural R&D investment. Reported expenditure data are collected in current local currency units (LCU) and refer to total institutional expenditures, as provided by national respondents. Coverage of the private for-profit sector remains limited and is therefore excluded from the dataset. To support temporal analysis and international comparability, expenditure indicators are also expressed in constant local currency units, using country-specific GDP deflators sourced from FAOSTAT. In addition, selected indicators relate agricultural R&D expenditures to key structural variables, such as agricultural value added, allowing for meaningful cross-country comparisons of research intensity and resource allocation.