Kenya vs Russian Federation: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency)

Kenya
16,530 million SLC
in 2023
Russian Federation
22,943 million SLC
in 2019
Kenya rank
22nd
Russian Federation rank
19th

Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency) over time

  • Kenya
  • Russian Federation
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k200420132023

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 22,943 million SLC against 16,530 million SLC in Kenya, a difference of 6,413 million SLC.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.4 times Kenya's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Kenya ahead.

Kenya ranks 22nd and Russian Federation ranks 19th of 97 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Russian Federation Difference Ahead
2000s 5,019 million SLC 5,102 million SLC 82.96 million SLC Russian Federation
2010s 10,371 million SLC 14,626 million SLC 4,255 million SLC Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency), Kenya or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 22,943 million SLC against 16,530 million SLC in Kenya as of 2019.
What is the difference in total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency) between Kenya and Russian Federation?
6,413 million SLC, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Russian Federation?
10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do Kenya and Russian Federation rank globally for total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency)?
Kenya ranks 22nd and Russian Federation ranks 19th of 97 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs Russian Federation: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/total-expenditure-in-agricultural-r-and-d-standard-local-currency-total-government-higher/kenya/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/total-expenditure-in-agricultural-r-and-d-standard-local-currency-total-government-higher/kenya/russian-federation/">Kenya vs Russian Federation: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
98 places, 1,334 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

The dataset contains a set of financial indicators describing national expenditures on agricultural research and development (R&D). The indicators are derived primarily from responses to the financial resources section of the ASTI questionnaire, complemented with selected external macroeconomic indicators required to ensure comparability across countries and over time.The dataset includes both directly reported financial aggregates and derived indicators, reflecting different dimensions of agricultural R&D investment. Reported expenditure data are collected in current local currency units (LCU) and refer to total institutional expenditures, as provided by national respondents. Coverage of the private for-profit sector remains limited and is therefore excluded from the dataset. To support temporal analysis and international comparability, expenditure indicators are also expressed in constant local currency units, using country-specific GDP deflators sourced from FAOSTAT. In addition, selected indicators relate agricultural R&D expenditures to key structural variables, such as agricultural value added, allowing for meaningful cross-country comparisons of research intensity and resource allocation.