Gambia vs Guinea-Bissau: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency)

Gambia
71.47 million SLC
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau
56.6 million SLC
in 2023
Gambia rank
75th
Guinea-Bissau rank
78th

Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency) over time

  • Gambia
  • Guinea-Bissau
020406080200420132023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 71.47 million SLC against 56.6 million SLC in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 14.87 million SLC.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.3 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Gambia ranks 75th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 78th of 97 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 2 and Guinea-Bissau in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
2000s 32.21 million SLC 76.96 million SLC 44.75 million SLC Guinea-Bissau
2010s 56.34 million SLC 43.66 million SLC 12.67 million SLC Gambia
2020s 69.38 million SLC 51.2 million SLC 18.18 million SLC Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency), Gambia or Guinea-Bissau?
Gambia, at 71.47 million SLC against 56.6 million SLC in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency) between Gambia and Guinea-Bissau?
14.87 million SLC, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Guinea-Bissau?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency)?
Gambia ranks 75th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 78th of 97 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Guinea-Bissau: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/total-expenditure-in-agricultural-r-and-d-standard-local-currency-total-government-higher/gambia-the/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/total-expenditure-in-agricultural-r-and-d-standard-local-currency-total-government-higher/gambia-the/guinea-bissau/">Gambia vs Guinea-Bissau: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
98 places, 1,334 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

The dataset contains a set of financial indicators describing national expenditures on agricultural research and development (R&D). The indicators are derived primarily from responses to the financial resources section of the ASTI questionnaire, complemented with selected external macroeconomic indicators required to ensure comparability across countries and over time.The dataset includes both directly reported financial aggregates and derived indicators, reflecting different dimensions of agricultural R&D investment. Reported expenditure data are collected in current local currency units (LCU) and refer to total institutional expenditures, as provided by national respondents. Coverage of the private for-profit sector remains limited and is therefore excluded from the dataset. To support temporal analysis and international comparability, expenditure indicators are also expressed in constant local currency units, using country-specific GDP deflators sourced from FAOSTAT. In addition, selected indicators relate agricultural R&D expenditures to key structural variables, such as agricultural value added, allowing for meaningful cross-country comparisons of research intensity and resource allocation.